Concurrent Validity of the Sixty-Second Drawing Test in Measuring High-Schoolers’ Close Relationships and Depression

Author:

Kövi Zsuzsanna1ORCID,Hittner James B.2,Mirnics Zsuzsanna3,Grezsa Ferenc4,Smohai Máté1,Jakšić Nenad5,Mészáros Veronika1,Rózsa Sándor3,Vargha András1,Tanyi Zsuzsanna3,Vass Zoltán1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Psychology, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Budapest, Hungary

2. Department of Psychology, College of Charleston, SC, USA

3. Department of Personality Psychology, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Budapest, Hungary

4. Center for Postgraduate Studies, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Budapest, Hungary

5. Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Abstract. Although clinicians have a long history of using drawings for personality and emotional assessment, the empirical validation of the drawings has been inconsistent. The goal of this study was to examine the validity of the Sixty-Second Drawing Test (SSDT) in predicting close relationships and depression. The sample consisted of 2,883 Hungarian students. The SSDT required participants to draw a series of circles, where the circles represented the self, significant others, different moods, and God. Standardized questionnaires (the Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised and the Children’s Depression Inventory) were also administered. Generally speaking, small distances and relatively smaller self-circles were associated with better relationships. Depression was indicated by drawing large bad-mood circles that were close to one’s self-circle, along with small happiness-circles that were distant from one’s self-circle. The magnitudes of all associations were small to moderate, with explained variances ranging from 7.6% to 21.9%. The results suggest that using drawings of circles to represent important object-relations can, to some extent, predict interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms. Although we do not advocate using the SSDT as a clinical diagnostic measure, it can serve as a useful screening tool for identifying potential relational and affective difficulties.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3