Affiliation:
1. Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA
Abstract
Abstract. The purpose of this study was to examine how pilots respond to conflicting information on the flight deck. In this study, 108 airline, corporate, and general aviation pilots completed an online questionnaire reporting weather, traffic, and navigation information conflicts experienced on the flight deck, including which information sources they trusted and acted on. Results indicated that weather information conflicts are most commonly experienced, and typically between a certified source in the panel and an uncertified electronic flight bag application. Most participants (a) trusted certified systems due to their accuracy, reliability, recency, and knowledge about the source, and (2) acted on the certified system due to trust, being trained and required to use it, and its indicating a more hazardous situation.
Reference20 articles.
1. Bliss,
J., Fallon,
C., Bustamante,
E., Bailey,
W. III, & Anderson,
B. (2005). Reactions of air transport flight crews to displays of weather during simulated flight (Report ODURF-130971). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20050110297
2. Integrating Uncertified Information from the Electronic Flight Bag into the Aircraft Panel: Impacts on Pilot Response
3. Review of Aviation Safety Databases to Identify Information Discrepancies Experienced on the Flight Deck
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Decision making in aviation;Human Factors in Aviation and Aerospace;2023