Comparing Social Perceptions of Culturally Emic Protagonists Using the Stereotype Content Model

Author:

Schemmerling Moritz1ORCID,Friehs Maria-Therese1ORCID,Kotzur Patrick F.2ORCID,Bastias Franco3ORCID,De Keersmaecker Jonas4ORCID,Macedo Francisco G.5ORCID,Neto Felix6ORCID,Neto Joana7,Pietraszkiewicz Agnieszka8ORCID,Schmid Katharina4ORCID,Sczesny Sabine8,Torres Claudio5ORCID,Boehnke Klaus9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fakultät Psychologie, FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany

2. Department of Psychology, Durham University, UK

3. Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality”, Universität Konstanz, Germany

4. Department of People Management and Organization, Ramon Llull University, Esade, Spain

5. Department of Social and Work Psychology, University of Brasilia, Brazil

6. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, University of Porto, Portugal

7. Research on Management and Information Technologies (REMIT), Universidade Portucalense, Porto, Portugal

8. Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland

9. Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences (BIGSSS), Constructor University, Bremen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract: Cross-cultural comparisons are often based on a single itemset that is used in several cultures and languages being translated semantically correct. In contrast, a new, emic, approach measures the same construct with individually created items for each culture and language. To test this emic approach, the current paper used the stereotype content model (SCM) with its dimensions, warmth, and competence. It is used to compare perceptions of people, residing in different countries, speaking different languages. The current paper reports a study ( N = 2,901) that tests whether an adapted scale allows reliable and structurally valid measurement and comparisons of culturally emic protagonists on SCM dimensions across four languages (English, German, Portuguese, Spanish) in eight countries (United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Portugal, Brazil, Spain, Argentina). The warmth dimension emerges as largely universal, but the competence dimension is a more culture-specific construct. Cross-cultural comparisons as to the competence dimension should be treated with care.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3