Measuring Anxiety Symptoms – Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Scale Questionnaire

Author:

Peerbooms Vivian12ORCID,Michael van den Boogaard Th.3,Melchior Kim24,Jongerling Joran5ORCID,van der Heiden Colin46

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anxiety Disorders, Outpatient Treatment Center PsyQ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2. Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Affective Disorders, Outpatient Treatment Center PsyQ, The Hague, The Netherlands

4. Department of Anxiety Disorders, Outpatient Treatment Center PsyQ, The Hague, The Netherlands

5. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, The Netherlands

6. Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (LWASQ) is a self-report questionnaire based on the tripartite model of Lang (1971) for measuring treatment progress. However, so far little is known about its psychometric qualities. Two studies were conducted to get more clarity on the factor structure and reliability of the LWASQ. Method: Factor structure and internal consistency of the LWASQ were assessed using a sample of 2,117 patients with anxiety disorders. Test–retest reliability was measured with a three-week interval, using a sample of 49 people in a general population. We aimed to measure construct validity with a third sample of patients with anxiety disorders, but were not able to due to a small sample size. Results: Factor analysis confirmed the three known factors of the LWASQ, i.e., somatic complaints, cognitive problems, and behavioral complaints. Both internal consistency for all three subscales ( r = .852–.927) and test–retest reliability were found to be good ( r = .88). Conclusion: Psychometric properties of the LWASQ are promising, but further validation is needed to draw more definitive conclusions regarding its usefulness in a clinical population.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Correction to Peerbooms et al. (2024);Psychological Test Adaptation and Development;2024-02-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3