Techno-Realism: Navigating New Challenges in the Contemporary Role of Technology in Politics

Author:

Sukma Isti MartaORCID

Abstract

This paper aims to introduce a new theory, techno-realism, which is derived from political realism, to help comprehend the complex connections between technology and politics. According to techno-realism, technology serves as a means of power, with the innate drive for survival in human nature shaping the formation of identity. The research question at the core of this study revolves around the extent to which technology influences contemporary political science and whether it truly serves as a means of power. Three concepts are introduced: identity establishment, technology as the central source of power, and non-state actors in politics. The primary case study focuses on the complexity of the issue in Xinjiang, examining the application of cyberpolitics in the region. The second case study explores technology’s role in Indonesia’s political power struggle, as evidenced by its 2024 elections and the abuse of information and electronic transaction law effectiveness to control freedom of speech. Additionally, this paper introduces a case study on the Indo-Pacific regional power dynamics in confronting “digital authoritarianism”. This paper underscores the imperative for a new theoretical framework, adapted from political realism, which despite being subject to considerable criticism, has the potential for further development, placing technology at the core of analysis. Recognising the central roles of technology, identity formation, and non-state actors, techno-realism offers valuable insights for navigating complex political landscapes and informing strategic responses to emerging challenges. However, further research is needed to understand completely its applicability and limitations across different contexts, as demonstrated by the case studies presented in this paper.

Publisher

War Studies University

Reference64 articles.

1. Apple Newsroom (2019) A message about IOS security. Available at: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/09/a-message-about-ios-security/ (Accessed: 2 September 2023).

2. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: ‘Tackling the Three Evils’. A Regional Response to Non-traditional Security Challenges or an Anti-Western Bloc?

3. Arlegue, C. (2022) The weaponization of digital authoritarianism in the Philippines during COVID-19. ‘The weaponization of digital authoritarianism in the Philippines during COVID-19’. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 33. Available at: https://kyotoreview.org/issue-33/the-weaponization-of-digital-authoritarianism-in-thephilippines-during-covid-19/ (Accessed: 20 March 2024).

4. Baquiran, A.J. (2023) ‘Between the eagle and the dragon: What is the Philippines’ foreign policy?’, blog post. Graduate School of Public Policy (GraSPP), 16 November. Available at: https://www.pp.u-tokyo.ac.jp/graspp-blog/the-philippines-foreign-policy/ (Accessed: 20 March 2024).

5. Bliddal, H., Sylvest, C. and Wilson, P. (eds.) (2013) Classics of international relations: Essays in criticism and appreciation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 61–68.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3