Abstract
This paper aims to introduce a new theory, techno-realism, which is derived from political realism, to help comprehend the complex connections between technology and politics. According to techno-realism, technology serves as a means of power, with the innate drive
for survival in human nature shaping the formation of identity. The research question at the core of this study revolves around the
extent to which technology influences contemporary political science and whether it truly serves as a means of power. Three concepts
are introduced: identity establishment, technology as the central source of power, and non-state actors in politics. The primary case
study focuses on the complexity of the issue in Xinjiang, examining the application of cyberpolitics in the region. The second case
study explores technology’s role in Indonesia’s political power struggle, as evidenced by its 2024 elections and the abuse of information
and electronic transaction law effectiveness to control freedom of speech. Additionally, this paper introduces a case study on the
Indo-Pacific regional power dynamics in confronting “digital authoritarianism”. This paper underscores the imperative for a new
theoretical framework, adapted from political realism, which despite being subject to considerable criticism, has the potential for
further development, placing technology at the core of analysis. Recognising the central roles of technology, identity formation, and
non-state actors, techno-realism offers valuable insights for navigating complex political landscapes and informing strategic responses
to emerging challenges. However, further research is needed to understand completely its applicability and limitations across different
contexts, as demonstrated by the case studies presented in this paper.
Reference64 articles.
1. Apple Newsroom (2019) A message about IOS security. Available at: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/09/a-message-about-ios-security/ (Accessed: 2 September 2023).
2. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: ‘Tackling the Three Evils’. A Regional Response to Non-traditional Security Challenges or an Anti-Western Bloc?
3. Arlegue, C. (2022) The weaponization of digital authoritarianism in the Philippines during COVID-19. ‘The weaponization of digital authoritarianism in the Philippines during COVID-19’. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 33. Available at: https://kyotoreview.org/issue-33/the-weaponization-of-digital-authoritarianism-in-thephilippines-during-covid-19/ (Accessed: 20 March 2024).
4. Baquiran, A.J. (2023) ‘Between the eagle and the dragon: What is the Philippines’ foreign policy?’, blog post. Graduate School of Public Policy (GraSPP), 16 November. Available at: https://www.pp.u-tokyo.ac.jp/graspp-blog/the-philippines-foreign-policy/ (Accessed: 20 March 2024).
5. Bliddal, H., Sylvest, C. and Wilson, P. (eds.) (2013) Classics of international relations: Essays in criticism and appreciation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 61–68.