Immunization Status Analysis Based On Knowledge Characteristics And Family Support
-
Published:2022-06-30
Issue:1
Volume:4
Page:136-141
-
ISSN:2809-3208
-
Container-title:Journal of Applied Nursing and Health
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:janh
Author:
Muhammed A Hamid,Alex
Abstract
Background: Immunization is one of the preventative measures to spread the disease to other regions, which has proven to be very cost-effective. Good knowledge and support from families in implementing immunizations will improve the immunization status of children. The purpose is to know whether there is a relationship between basic immunization status based on knowledge and family support.
Methods: The design used in the study is cross-sectional. The population is all mothers with babies. The sample size was 53 respondents using the Conventional Sampling technique. The independent variable of research is family knowledge and support. The dependent variable is immunization status. Data were collected using a questionnaire; then, data were analyzed using logistic regression tests with a significance level of α ≤ 0.05.
Results: The results showed that almost half of the respondents had sufficient knowledge of 26 respondents (49.1%), sufficient family support of 21 respondents (39.6%), and the complete immunization status of 34 respondents (64.2%). The results obtained by Overall Statistics with a significance value of (p) 0,000 which means that family knowledge and support affect immunization status. This means there is a Relationship between Basic Immunization Status Based on Characteristics of Knowledge and Family Support.
Conclusion: There is a relationship between primary immunization status based on the characteristics of knowledge and family support
Publisher
Lembaga Chakra Brahmanda Lentera
Reference20 articles.
1. Ashari, A. (2021). Maternal Referral Delay Factors . Journal of Applied Nursing and Health, 3(2 SE-Articles), 7–16. https://janh.candle.or.id/index.php/janh/article/view/2 2. Bangura, J. B., Xiao, S., Qiu, D., Ouyang, F., & Chen, L. (2020). Barriers to childhood immunization in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–15. 3. Darrah, P. A., Zeppa, J. J., Maiello, P., Hackney, J. A., Wadsworth, M. H., Hughes, T. K., Pokkali, S., Swanson, P. A., Grant, N. L., & Rodgers, M. A. (2020). Prevention of tuberculosis in macaques after intravenous BCG immunization. Nature, 577(7788), 95–102. 4. Gheibi Hayat, S. M., & Darroudi, M. (2019). Nanovaccine: a novel approach in immunization. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 234(8), 12530–12536. 5. Gold, M. S., MacDonald, N. E., McMurtry, C. M., Balakrishnan, M. R., Heininger, U., Menning, L., Benes, O., Pless, R., & Zuber, P. L. F. (2020). Immunization stress-related response–redefining immunization anxiety-related reaction as an adverse event following immunization. Vaccine, 38(14), 3015–3020.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|