Comparison of Whole Genome Amplification Methods for Analysis of DNA Extracted from Microdissected Early Breast Lesions in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

Author:

Arneson Nona1,Moreno Juan23,Iakovlev Vladimir45,Ghazani Arezou15,Warren Keisha1,McCready David6,Jurisica Igor789,Done Susan J.12358

Affiliation:

1. Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9

2. Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9

3. Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4

4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 1W8

5. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8

6. Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4

7. Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1

8. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1A1

9. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G4

Abstract

To understand cancer progression, it is desirable to study the earliest stages of its development, which are often microscopic lesions. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a valuable high-throughput molecular approach for discovering DNA copy number changes; however, it requires a relatively large amount of DNA, which is difficult to obtain from microdissected lesions. Whole genome amplification (WGA) methods were developed to increase DNA quantity; however their reproducibility, fidelity, and suitability for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are questioned. Using aCGH analysis, we compared two widely used approaches for WGA: single cell comparative genomic hybridization protocol (SCOMP) and degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP-PCR). Cancer cell line and microdissected FFPE breast cancer DNA samples were amplified by the two WGA methods and subjected to aCGH. The genomic profiles of amplified DNA were compared with those of non-amplified controls by four analytic methods and validated by quantitative PCR (Q-PCR). We found that SCOMP-amplified samples had close similarity to non-amplified controls with concordance rates close to those of reference tests, while DOP-amplified samples had a statistically significant amount of changes. SCOMP is able to amplify small amounts of DNA extracted from FFPE samples and provides quality of aCGH data similar to non-amplified samples.

Funder

Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3