İstanbul’daki aile hekimlerinin geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp bakış açıları

Author:

ATAYOGLU Ali Timucin1ORCID,TOKAÇ Mahmut2ORCID,DOĞAN Sibel3ORCID,GÜNER Abdullah4ORCID,KOCAYİĞİT Erdoğan4ORCID,GÜNER Muharrem4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul

2. Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul

3. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul

4. Istanbul Provincial Health Directorate, Istanbul

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization, within the scope of the Traditional Medicine Strategy for 2014-2023, recommends the development of integrated health policies, particularly in the area of primary healthcare. However, family physicians often report feeling insufficiently trained to effectively integrate these practices into patient care. This study aims to assess the views, understanding, and experiences of family physicians regarding the utilization of Traditional & Complementary Medicine (T&CM).Methods: The family physicians employed by the Istanbul Health Directorate Public Health Services were solicited to participate in an 18-question online survey to assess their level of education in T&CM methods, their views on integration of T&CM into family medicine, and the impact of these practices on patient care.Results: A total of 324 family physicians took part in the survey; 12.0% were specialists, 64.5% had worked in primary care for over 10 years, and 59.6% were in the age range of 31-50 years. Among the physicians, the majority (70.1%) reported a preference for integrating T&CM practices with conventional medicine (ConvM). The majority of the participants (71.6%) had no formal T&CM training, and 66.4% reported inquiring about T&CM in their patient consultations. Over half of the physicians (56.79%) believed that T&CM methods should be used in preventive medicine. The most widely recognized T&CM technique was cupping therapy (18.5%), which was also the most frequently recommended method by physicians.Conclusion: Most of the family physicians who participated in the study expressed a desire for integrative medicine, despite acknowledging limited formal education in this field. Offering physicians training in evidence-based complementary medicine therapies could provide them with additional non-invasive treatment options. However, patients' diffidence to inform their family physicians about T&CM practices they undergo may pose significant risks. As a result, incorporating education on integrative medicine into formal medical education and residency training may be necessary.Keywords: Family physician, complementary medicine, integrative medicine, traditional medicine

Publisher

Family Practice and Palliative Care

Reference23 articles.

1. 1. Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Mullner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: A systematic review. Ochsner J. 2012;12(1):45-56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22438782/

2. 2. Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: A systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(10):924-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02945.x

3. 3. World Health Organization. Programme on Traditional Medicine. WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005. World Health Organization; 2002. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67163 (Access Date: October 24, 2022)

4. 4. Ock SM, Choi JY, Cha YS, Lee JB, Chun MS, Huh CH, et al. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in a general population in South Korea: Results from a national survey in 2006. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.1

5. 5. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence and determinants of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine provider use among adults from 32 countries. Chin J Integr Med. 2018;24(8):584-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-016-2748-y

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3