Abstract
AbstractExponential growth in the number of information sources, especially scientific journals, on one side and decreasing funding for their acquisition on the other, forces libraries to enhance their cooperation and constantly measure the relevance of their scientific journals collections, in order to continue supporting research, education and training, as well as services offered by their respective organizations and/or patrons, and to justify investments involved in developing and maintaining relevant scientific journals collections. A survey of international and local library science literature published during the last 30 years was made to screen the experience and effort involved in solving such problems. A list of indicators, based on screened literature sources, was compiled, which could influence decisions concerning the cancellation and/or retention of scientific journals in paper form
Reference81 articles.
1. Albee, B., & Dingley, B. (2000). U.S. periodical prices 2000. American Libraries, 31 (5), 78-82.
2. Albee, B., & Dingley, B. (2001). U.S. periodical prices 2001. American Libraries, 32 (5), 72-78.
3. Alexander, A. W. (1994). 1993 Charlestone Conference: Issues in Book and Serial Acquisitions : Preconference on Serials Cancellations. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 18 (3), 327-331.
4. Bick, D., & Sinha, R. (1991). Maintaining a high-quality, cost-effective journal collection. College & Research Libraries News, 52 (8), 485-490.
5. Birdsall, W. F. [et.al.]. (1998). I am read, therefore I am : faculty and psychology of journal cancellations. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24 (3), 240-241.