Adapted systematic review of implementation science strategies applied to digital health interventions (DHIs) in low middle income countries (LMICs): Impact on adoption and utilisation

Author:

Odoh LyndaORCID,Aimiosior Obehi

Abstract

Background Post the COVID-19 pandemic and with rising connectivity, digital health Interventions (DHIs) are being leveraged by innovators in Low middle-income countries (LMICs), to address healthcare challenges. Despite huge investments, interventions are poorly utilised due to health systems complexities, limited digital readiness and socioeconomic factors. Evolving evidence suggests that implementation science strategies can play a significant role in reducing the complexities within the sociotechnical domains. This study aims to understand how implementation science strategies are being applied to patient-focused DHIs in LMICs, its impact on adoption and utilisation. Methods A triangulated search was conducted on five electronic databases using a pretested strategy. A heterogeneous range of study types on patient-focused DHIs was included to capture different research methodologies used to describe implementation. The screening was done by two reviewers using inclusion/exclusion criteria registered on PROSPERO. Quality was accessed using the JBI appraisal tool for case studies, the CASP quality assessment tool for systematic reviews and qualitative studies, and the ROBIN-I tool for quasi-experimental studies. Synthesis was by Popay et al's guidance on narrative synthesis. Results Eleven studies from eight countries met the inclusion criteria. Through the lens of the NASSS framework and the ERIC clusters, forty-five implementation science strategies out of seventy-three were identified of which only twenty-seven percent of included studies applied more than fifty percent of the identified strategies. Conclusions The trend revealed that DHIs with higher and strategic application patterns tackled more sociotechnical system complexities and experienced better adoption/ utilisation. For the basics, we identified four heavy weight favorability factors that should be considered when choosing implementation strategies in this context. Large scale randomised interventional studies are however recommended to further measure impact. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42023388786

Funder

n/a

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3