Interventions for supporting self-management in people with musculoskeletal pain, including focus on varying levels of health literacy: A systematic overview of reviews

Author:

Babatunde Opeyemi OORCID,Corp Nadia,Shivji Noureen,Rowlands Gill,Quicke JonathanORCID,Healey Emma L,Protheroe JoanneORCID,van der Windt Danielle A

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a major cause of disability globally, affecting one in three adults. Self-management is a core recommendation for managing MSK pain; however, most self-management programmes require a high level of patient engagement, which may be partly influenced by health literacy levels. This overview aims to summarise current evidence on supported self-management and the influence of varying levels of health literacy in people with MSK pain.  Methods: A systematic search was conducted for relevant systematic reviews in databases (Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHLPlus, AMED, and PsycInfo). Data on study populations (including markers of health literacy), characteristics, and outcomes of supported self-management such as self-efficacy in pain management were extracted. Quality of systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and strength of evidence rated using a modified GRADE approach. Results: In total, 40 systematic reviews contributed evidence to this overview. Based on intervention components and mode of delivery, three main self-management intervention approaches were indicated: structured self-management education programmes (10 reviews), self-directed self-management (four reviews), and combined self-management activity and education programmes (26 reviews). MSK patients with low health literacy levels were found to have poorer outcomes with current self-management interventions. The strength of evidence for self-efficacy in pain management was assessed as low (across the three approaches). Only one review systematically extracted data on measures or markers of health literacy, highlighting an important gap in evidence.  Conclusions: A comprehensive summary and critical assessment of current evidence on supported self-management and the influence of health literacy levels among patients with MSK pain was presented. There is a gap in evidence regarding potential mediators of the effects of supported self-management among people with musculoskeletal conditions and low levels of health literacy, thereby limiting the opportunity to positively influence outcomes.

Funder

Versus Arthritis

National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands

National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North East North Cumbria

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3