Development, validation and use of artificial-intelligence-related technologies to assess basic motor skills in children: a scoping review

Author:

Figueroa-Quiñones JoelORCID,Ipanaque-Neyra Juan,Gómez Hurtado HeberORCID,Bazo-Alvarez Oscar,Bazo-Alvarez Juan Carlos

Abstract

Background: In basic motor skills evaluation, two observersers can eventually mark the same child’s performance differently. When systematic, this brings serious noise to the assessment. New motion sensing and tracking technologies offer more precise measures of these children’s capabilities. We aimed to review current development, validation and use of artificial intelligence-related technologies that assess basic motor skills in children aged 3 to 6 years old. Methods: We performed a scoping review in Medline, EBSCO, IEEE and Web of Science databases. PRISMA Extension recommendations for scoping reviews were applied for the full review, whereas the COSMIN criteria for diagnostic instruments helped to evaluate the validation of the artificial intelligence (AI)-related measurements. Results: We found 672 studies, from which 12 were finally selected, 7 related to development and validation and 5 related to use. From the 7 studies, we tracked 10 other publications updating and/or using these technologies. Engineering work and technological features have been prioritised in studies about AI-related technologies. The validation of these algorithms was strictly based on engineering criteria; it means, no substantive knowledge of the medical or psychological aspects of motor skills was integrated into the validation process. Technical features typically evaluated in psychometric instruments designed for assessing motor skills in children were also ignored (e.g., COSMIN criteria). The use of these AI-related technologies in scientific research is still limited. Conclusion: Clinical measurement standards have not been integrated into the development of AI-related technologies for measuring basic motor skills in children. This compromises the validity, reliability and practical utility of these tools, so future improvement in this type of research is needed.

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3