Comparison of crestal bone loss and papilla fill after conventional and immediate implant placement: A 12 month clinical and radiographic prospective study

Author:

Raj Akanksha,Pradhan Sweta,Shetty Preetha,Kadakampally David,Shetty NeethaORCID

Abstract

Background: The problem of missing teeth persists in all age groups. The main objective of implants in dentistry is to provide a restoration that reconstructs the shape and restores esthetics and functions of edentulous areas. The objectives of this study are to compare the crestal bone level changes and papillary fill after placement of implants in fresh extraction socket, i.e. immediate implant placement, and healed extraction socket, i.e. delayed or conventional implant placement, and to assess other clinical parameters such as modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) and gingival biotype in between the groups and within the   groups. Methods: 18 patients were recruited in the study out of which 9 patients received implants as per immediate implant placement protocol (group 1) and 9 patients received implants as per conventional implant placement protocol (group 2). All patients were evaluated for gingival biotype, mPI and mGI and papillary fill was assessed as per Jemt’s papilla score as clinical parameters. Implant site was assessed for radiographic bone loss using Image J software. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t test, paired t test and chi square test. Results: At the end of 1 year, results showed that crestal bone loss was seen more in the immediate group than the conventional group. Conventional implants showed better papillary fill than implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Plaque scores were assessed as per modified plaque index, which showed better results in the conventional group. Modified gingival index was used to assess gingival status which showed better results in the immediate group one year later. Conclusions: Findings from the study suggest that crestal bone loss was found to be increased in the immediate group than the conventional group and papillary fill was better in the conventional group than the immediate group. Registration: CTRI (CTRI/2019/09/021340).

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. Contemporary implant dentistry – third edition.;C Mish

2. Clinical effectiveness of implant- supported single tooth replacement: The Toronto stydy.;L Avivi-Arber;Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants.,1996

3. A systemic review of the 5- year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns.;R Jung;Clin. Oral Implants Res.,2008

4. A five – year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants.;H Weber;Clin. Oral Implants Res.,19, 2000

5. Clinical evaluation of single tooth restorations supported by osseointegated implants: A retrospective study.;L Anders Ekfeltdt;Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants.,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3