Comparative evaluation of the forces produced by tongue on circummaxillary sutures in skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary hypoplasia using tongue crib with that of facemask therapy - A FEM study
-
Published:2023-06-14
Issue:
Volume:12
Page:672
-
ISSN:2046-1402
-
Container-title:F1000Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:F1000Res
Author:
Mathew Jeni AnnORCID,
Kamble Ranjit H,
Shrivastav Sunita,
Daigavane Pallavi S
Abstract
Background: Class III malocclusion has the lowest incidence when compared to other malocclusions. Class III malocclusion can be present in retrognathic maxilla, prognathic mandible or a combination. Various modalities have been used in treatment. Facemask with expansion is an effective appliance used for protraction in case of retrognathic mandible; although it is effective, dentists have to deal with patient compliance. Efforts have been directed to simplify the design of appliance to redirect growth. The finite element method can be used to simulate conditions to check various hypothesis. Methods: A finite element method (FEM) study was performed in two important steps: generation of model and model analysis. A tongue force of 4-6 pounds was applied to cribs (Group I) based on the frequency of swallowing per day (minimum to maximum). In facemask therapy (Group II), a downward force at 30 degrees along with transverse expansion of 1N was applied. Mean values of both sides were considered. Results: Von-Mises stresses in Group I and Group II showed a non-significant difference (p=0.535). Displacement in Group I and Group II showed a significant difference (p=0.0001). Maximum amount of displacement was seen in maxillary dentition on canines and incisors, and minimum stress was seen on posterior teeth in both interventional therapies, even though the Von-Mises stresses generated were different in both groups. Overall displacement in both Group I and Group II was similar. Conclusions: Both modalities were effective in the treatment of Class III malocclusion. The force transmission varied and overall displacement was similar in both modalities, which implies both modalities are effective in treating Class III malocclusion.
Funder
Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences
Publisher
F1000 Research Ltd
Subject
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference14 articles.
1. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion.;R Sanborn;Angle Orthod.,1955 Oct
2. Classification of malocclusion.;E Angle;Dent. Cosmos.,1899
3. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.;E Ellis;J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,1984 May 1
4. A comparative evaluation of different compensating curves in the lingual and labial techniques using 3D FEM.;S Sung;Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.,2003 Apr 1
5. Biomechanics of craniofacial sutures: orthopedic implications.;J Mao;Angle Orthod.,2003 Apr