Testing Construct Validity of the Clinical Supervision Scale in Intensive Care Units at Tertiary Care Hospitals in the Northeast of Thailand

Author:

JUNTACHUM Wanchanok,SRIJAKKOT Jitpinan,DAPHA Sompratthana,JUMPAMOOL Apinya,MANEERUANGDAJ Kanittha,BOONSAWASDGULCHAI Peerapong,SOOKPIER Pornpimon,SIRIMONTRI Jeerawan

Abstract

Clinical supervision is the process by which supervisors treat their supervisees through interpersonal relationships to help supervisees develop their knowledge of the ability to perform clinical duties to provide quality service. However, from the literature review, it was found that a tool for assessing supervisors’ clinical supervision has not been clearly developed, especially in the context of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), which requires close supervision and monitoring of nurses to provide the highest level of safety for patients. Therefore, the research objective was to analyze the construct validity of the clinical supervision scale in the care units of tertiary hospitals in Northeast Thailand. Methods Participants were 234 nurses in intensive care units at tertiary hospitals located in Northeast of Thailand. Data were collected using a questionnaire as perceived by registered nurses based on the framework of Proctor’s model using the 18-item Clinical Supervision Scale. Content validity was explored by seven experts, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for reliability was .967. EFA was conducted to identify factors affecting the function of clinical supervision. CFA was used to ascertain the model fit. Results The EFA showed a three-factor clinical supervision and CFA. The results indicated that the hypothesis model of clinical supervision showed goodness of fit with empirical data throughout the sample (Chi-square = 103.501, df = 100, p-value = .385, CFI = .999, GFI = .955, AGFI= .923, RMSEA =.012). These results were within acceptable ranges, which indicated that the construct validity of the clinical supervision scale in the intensive care unit was consistent with Proctor’s functions: promoting professional accountability and quality control (normative function), skill and knowledge development (formative function), and providing support and personal well-being (restorative function).

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference22 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3