Conceptions of bibliographic managers in university teachers. An approach in Latin American

Author:

Abad-Lezama Irene Roxana,Pantigoso-Leython NathalíORCID,Colina-Ysea Félix José,Jara-Llanos Gleny Secibel

Abstract

Background Due to the accumulation of information generated by the information society, it is necessary to establish scientific criteria for its systematization. The objective of the research was to understand the implicit theories on the use of bibliographic managers in the organization of scientific information in university teachers in Latin American university teachers (Colombia, Ecuador and Peru). Methods The interpretative paradigm, phenomenological method and qualitative approach were used. The key informants were defined by fifteen teachers with research experience. The technique was the semi-structured interview, and the instrument was the interview script. The study was based on four cyclical-recursive moments, the first was the natural attitude, where information was obtained from the key informants as a result of the interviews. The second moment allowed the epoche-eidetic reduction, consisting of the analysis of each interview. The third moment originated the transcendental epoche-reduction, analyzing each attribute and their consistency. The fourth moment revealed the constitution of the study, integrating in a semantic network the categories, subcategories, and attributes that emerged. Results Even when it is recognized from the cognitive conception about the concept of bibliographic managers, its applicability or use, it seems not to be so effective in scientific academic spaces and activities, because teachers are still anchored to the traditionalist vision of organizing information through “drive, folder or excel”, reflecting the resistance to change. Conclusions The imperative need for continuous training in the use of bibliographic managers in both students and teachers is asserted, reflected as a transversal strategy throughout all academic cycles and semesters and internalized as a research policy that leads to generate a new change in the conception of researching reliable scientific sources, optimizing time, organizing information and guaranteeing quality research.

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference27 articles.

1. Métodos cuantitativos, métodos cualitativos o su combinación en la investigación: un acercamiento en las ciencias sociales [Quantitative methods, qualitative methods or their combination in research: an approach in the social sciences].;P Cadena-Iñiguez;Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas [Mexican Journal of Agricultural Sciences].,2017

2. Utilidad de los gestores bibliográficos en la organización de la información para fines investigativos [Utility of bibliographic managers in the organization of information for research purposes].;M Gallegos;Formación Universitaria [University Training].,2017

3. Los Gestores Bibliográficos: Un Atisbo Teórico [The Bibliographic Managers: A Theoretical Overview].;O Arriola,2016

4. El gestor bibliográfico digital colaborativo como herramienta de apoyo al proceso de investigación [The collaborative digital bibliographic manager as a tool to support the research process].;W Mercado;Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior [Ibero-American Journal of Higher Education].,2022

5. Competencias TIC para investigación en docentes de la FOUNC con la implementación del Programa de Formación a Investigadores [ICT competencies for research in FOUNC teachers with the implementation of the Researcher Training Program] 2015-2018.;A Núñez;Scientia Oralis Salutem.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3