Abstract
50 years after its introduction, brain death remains controversial among scholars. The debates focus on one question: is brain death a good criterion for determining death? This question has been answered from various perspectives: medical, metaphysical, ethical, and legal or political. Most authors either defend the criterion as it is, propose some minor or major revisions, or advocate abandoning it and finding better solutions to the problems that brain death was intended to solve when it was introduced. In short, debates about brain death have been characterized by partisanship, for or against. Here I plead for a non-partisan approach that has been overlooked in the literature: the epistemological or philosophy of science approach. Some scholars claim that human death is a matter of fact, a biological phenomenon whose occurrence can be determined empirically, based on science. We should take this claim seriously, whether we agree with it or not. The question is: how do we know that human death is a scientific matter of fact? Taking the epistemological approach means, among other things, examining how the determination of human death became an object of scientific inquiry, exploring the nature of the brain death criterion itself, and analysing the meaning of its core concepts such as “irreversibility” and “functions”.
Subject
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference87 articles.
1. Assessing Time-Resolved fNIRS for Brain-Computer Interface Applications of Mental Communication.;A Abdalmalak;Front. Neurosci.,2020
2. The Dead Donor Rule: Should We Stretch It, Bend It, or Abandon It?.;R Arnold;Kennedy Inst. Ethics J.,1993
3. Individual choice in the definition of death.;A Bagheri;J. Med. Ethics.,2007
4. Transfer of personality to a synthetic human (‘mind uploading’) and the social construction of identity.;S Bamford;J. Conscious. Stud.,2017
5. Human Death and the Destruction of the Neocortex