Navigating Sample Size Determination in Educational Research: A Rapid Review Unveiling Strategies, Challenges, and Recommendations.

Author:

Besekar SmrutiORCID,Jogdand Sangita,Naqvi WaqarORCID

Abstract

Background By conducting an in-depth study of the publications, a review was conducted with the goal of evaluating the sample size in educational research. The sample size, represented by the letter “n,” is a key factor in this research because it specifies the number of participants who represent the target population. Although various studies have been published in the literature defining the processes for calculating sample sizes, there is still much uncertainty. It is vital to understand that there is no single all-encompassing method for determining sample sizes for different study designs. Instead, different study designs call for different approaches to determine sample numbers. Methods Information was retrieved from the databases in accordance with updated PRISMA recommendations. The keywords used for the retrieval of the relevant articles from two databases (Google Scholar and PubMed). The articles were selected by thorough scrutiny and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Seven articles were selected from the 9282 articles. The comparison was made among the studies in the relation to methods, objective, and outcome from the enrolled studies. Conclusions The evaluation of the seven studies as a whole concluded that the sample size for testing any novel approach essentially required 24.24 participants in each group. The median sample size for the simulation-based educational research was 30. Further research is required to determine the proper sample size based on a single universal formula for all types of designs.

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference34 articles.

1. Negative studies published in medical journals of India do not give sufficient information regarding power/sample size calculation and confidence interval.;Jaykaran;J. Postgrad. Med.,Apr 2011

2. Reporting of sample size and power in negative clinical trials published in Indian medical journals.;C Jaykaran;J. Pharm.,July 2011

3. Sample size for ophthalmology studies.;T Naduvilath;Indian J. Ophthalmol.,September 2000

4. Sample size in clinical research, the number we need. Semantic Scholar.;P Patra,2012

5. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.;M Page;The BMJ.,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Navigating the Tourism Terrain: A Holistic Approach from Industry Dynamics to Marketing Strategies;2024 Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (CCICT);2024-04-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3