Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis
-
Published:2020-06-16
Issue:
Volume:9
Page:616
-
ISSN:2046-1402
-
Container-title:F1000Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:F1000Res
Author:
Moola SandeepORCID,
Bhaumik Soumyadeep,
Nambiar Devaki
Abstract
Background: Health care services, in many countries, are increasingly being provided by cadres not trained as physicians, but capable of performing several diagnostic and clinical functions. These substitute health workers are referred to as mid-level health providers (MLHPs). The health and wellness centres under India’s Comprehensive Primary Health Care programme have teams led by MLHPs who can aid doctors. The objective of this study was to rapidly synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of MLHPs for primary health care. Methods: The review team undertook a rapid overview of systematic reviews that compared MLHPs with doctors and different types of MLHPs involved in the delivery of health care were included, with a perspective on low- and middle-income countries, including India. Results: Seven systematic reviews were included in the final report. Mortality outcomes in relation to pregnancy and childbirth care services showed no significant differences in care provided by MLHPs when compared with doctors. Pregnancy care provided by midwives was found to slightly improve quality of care when compared to care delivered by doctors. The risk of failure or incomplete abortion for surgical abortion procedures provided by MLHPs was twice when compared to the procedures provided by doctors. Moderate to high certainty evidence showed that initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients by a nurse or clinical officer slightly reduced mortality. High certainty evidence showed that chronic disease management by non-medical prescribers reduced some important physiological measures when compared to medical prescribing by doctors. Conclusions: To date, this is the first rapid overview of evidence on MLHPs. Evidence suggests that MLHPs might be suitable to deliver quality care in certain areas of health and they may be relevant and feasible in countries like India. However, the roles and subsequent training and regulation of MLHPs might be different for different care domains.
Funder
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
World Health Organization
Publisher
F1000 Research Ltd
Subject
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference19 articles.
1. Mid-level health providers: a promising resource to achieve the health Millennium Development Goals,2010
2. AYUSHMAN BHARAT: Comprehensive Primary Health Care through Health and Wellness Centers.,2018
3. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide.;A Tricco,2017
4. Extended data.docx.;S Moola;Figshare.,2020
5. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.;J Shea Beverley;BMJ.,2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献