Abstract
The estimation of the burden of a disease is one of the tasks with the longest tradition in Health Economics, which allows us to know the volume of resources that a country allocates to a specific health problem, and to compare countries and diseases. Although the fundamental objective of Health Systems is not to reduce the cost of the disease, but to improve the health of the population, the studies of burden of disease establish the economic seriousness of the problem, orienting the priorities of action. Government-funded medical expenditure in Uruguay for the last ten years has tripled in US dollars. The increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity has contributed to this growth. According to the World Health Organization, Uruguay has the highest growing trend in the prevalence of both overweight and obesity in South America. We have previously estimated that economic burden linked to obesity will be more than US$500 million by 2020, a figure close to 1% of the country’s GDP. In this study, we tried to generate a measure of value to ascertain the cost of inaction in the fight against obesity and its consequences linked to several non-communicable diseases. The cost of inaction is not defined as the cost of not doing, but as the cost of not implementing the right policies (in this case health prevention policies) at the right time.
Reference31 articles.
1. The Effects of Farm and Food Policy on Obesity in the United States.;J Alston;Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy.,2017
2. The Cost of Inaction. Case studies from Rwanda and Angola;S Anand,2012
3. The timing of the rise in U.S. obesity varies with measure of fatness.;R Burkhauser;Econ Hum Biol.,2009
4. Does Anything Work to Reduce Obesity? (Yes, Modestly).;J Cawley;J Health Polit Policy Law.,2016
5. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach.;J Cawley;J Health Econ.,2012