Abstract
Building on the concept of ‘impact literacy’ established in a previous paper from Bayley and Phipps, here we extend the principles of impact literacy in light of further insights into sector practice. More specifically, we focus on three additions needed in response to the sector-wide growth of impact: (1) differential levels of impact literacy; (2) institutional impact literacy and environment for impact; and (3) issues of ethics and values in research impact. This paper invites the sector to consider the relevance of all dimensions in establishing, maintaining and strengthening impact within the research landscape. We explore implications for individual professional development, institutional capacity building and ethical collaboration to maximise societal benefit.
Reference15 articles.
1. ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment.;P Adam;Health Res Policy Syst.,2018
2. Building the concept of research impact literacy.;J Bayley;Evidence Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice.,2017
3. Development of a framework for knowledge mobilisation and impact competencies.;J Bayley;Evid Policy.,2018
4. Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.;D Chinn;Soc Sci Med.,2011
5. Towards characterising negative impact: Introducing Grimpact;G Derrick;STI 2018 Conference Proceedings.,2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献