Abstract
Developments in neurotechnology are prompting concerns about the concepts of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty, among others. Many researchers and some policymakers have begun to propose that novel human rights are required to meet the challenges emerging neurotechnology poses. These proposals have seen high-profile discussion, gaining already state-level recognition in Chile. Others advocate a different approach by concentrating on data protection. This brief recommends this kind of focus in order to (i) help researchers to regulate the pace of development and (ii) respect the potential for risks to individuals by permitting them greater control over how their neurodata is used. A data-centred approach is an agile means of providing legal and ethical protection and permitting the direction of neurotechnology development toward producing positive impacts. This brief also refers to legislative change in Brazil, contrasted with Chile, where data law is to be revised to pre-empt neurotechnological issues. The Brazilian model emerges as an alternative that ought to be replicated by other lawmakers globally.
Reference18 articles.
1. Chamber of Deputies. Legislative process of bill No. 1229/2021.,2022a
2. Bill n. 522/2022.,2022b
3. Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorisation.;E Celeste;International Review of Law, Computers & Technology.,2021
4. Methodologies and Wearable Devices to Monitor Biophysical Parameters Related to Sleep Dysfunctions: An Overview.;R De Fazio;Micromachines.,2022
5. A proteção dos dados pessoais como um direito fundamental.;D Doneda;Joaçaba.,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献