Exploring the understanding of healthcare professionalism and perceived barriers and enablers towards the display of professionalism: a qualitative study

Author:

Chan Li YunORCID,Ganapathy Sashikumar

Abstract

Background Professionalism plays an integral part in healthcare. The range of definitions and domains of professionalism reflects its complexity and in Singapore, professionalism is codified by the Singapore Medical Council ethical code and ethical guidelines. Many have studied professionalism using a priori frameworks, but none used phenomenological studies to explore professionalism through the perception and lived experiences of healthcare professionals themselves. In addition, few have explored factors that hinder or promote professionalism in an Asian setting. These valuable insights help support the growth and development of programs on professionalism and guide us in changing and making policies. Methods Through semi-structured interviews, views and experiences of healthcare professionals towards professionalism in a single healthcare cluster were explored. Specifically, the perception of professionalism and perceived barriers and enablers were examined. Results Our study found that healthcare professionals largely share the same understanding of professionalism, encompassing conduct, communication, competency, collaboration, and image. Notably, some facets such as the importance of attire and inter-professional collaboration were emphasized more strongly by certain healthcare groups. Conclusions Healthcare professionals see high workload and stress as barriers while factors such as having the right qualities coupled with the support from mentors and team as enablers in the display of professionalism.

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference65 articles.

1. The culture of patient safety in an Iranian intensive care unit.;Z Abdi;J Nurs Manag.,2015

2. Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter.;Ann Intern Med.,2002

3. Personal factors affecting medical professionalism: a qualitative study in Iran.;F Alipour;J Med Ethics Hist Med.,2020

4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement,2017

5. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.;Z Blasi;Lancet.,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3