Defining tuberculosis stigma: a protocol for a systematic review, analysis, and thematic synthesis

Author:

Huff Dougles L.ORCID,Datta SumonaORCID,Evans Carlton A.ORCID

Abstract

Background Throughout recorded history, tuberculosis is believed to have killed more people than any other infectious disease. Despite the World Health Organization’s determination that preventing and controlling tuberculosis will require understanding and reducing tuberculosis stigma, we noted strikingly diverse definitions and lack of consensus in describing tuberculosis stigma. Furthermore, we found no systematic reviews in the existing tuberculosis stigma literature characterizing, comparing, or assessing tuberculosis stigma definitions or their consistency. To address this knowledge gap, we intend to conduct a systematic review of existing tuberculosis stigma definitions used in the academic research literature, and through quantitative synthesis of the words and phrases contained within those definitions, identify themes that characterize tuberculosis stigma. Methods Studies containing definitions of tuberculosis stigma will be identified by searching two electronic databases -- PubMed and PsycINFO – using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms “stigma[MeSH Major Topic] AND tuberculosis[MeSH Major Topic]”. Study inclusion criteria will consist of: a) original research published in English, (due to logistical constraints); b) qualitative studies using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions; c) quantitative studies including descriptive studies and trials, questionnaires, and cross-sectional surveys; and d) mixed method studies. Included studies will be searched for definitions of tuberculosis stigma using the search term “defin”. Descriptive words and phrases will be extracted from definitions and categorized into themes, based on noun, verb, adjective, and adverb derivatives; and synonym definitions. Predominant themes will then be identified and further categorized as emotion, thought, or behaviour themes. Relative frequencies of definitions, and definition words and phrases, will be compared quantitively. Conclusions This systematic review and thematic analysis is intended to characterize academic definitions of tuberculosis stigma and identify predominant tuberculosis stigma themes contained within those definitions. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42023440978; 23 July 2023).

Funder

Wellcome

National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center

National Institute of Health Research

United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3