Public attitudes to a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2: a mixed-methods study

Author:

Barker CarolineORCID,Collet KatharineORCID,Gbesemete DianeORCID,Piggin MariaORCID,Watson DaniellaORCID,Pristerà Philippa,Lawerence WendyORCID,Smith Emma,Bahrami-Hessari MichaelORCID,Johnson Halle,Baker Katherine,Qavi Ambar,McGrath Carmel,Chiu Christopher,Read Robert C.,Ward HelenORCID

Abstract

Background: Human challenge studies involve the deliberate exposure of healthy volunteers to an infectious micro-organism in a highly controlled and monitored way. They are used to understand infectious diseases and have contributed to the development of vaccines. In early 2020, the UK started exploring the feasibility of establishing a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2. Given the significant public interest and the complexity of the potential risks and benefits, it is vital that public views are considered in the design and approval of any such study and that investigators and ethics boards remain accountable to the public. Methods: Mixed methods study comprising online surveys conducted with 2,441 UK adults and in-depth virtual focus groups with 57 UK adults during October 2020 to explore the public’s attitudes to a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2 taking place in the UK. Results: There was overall agreement across the surveys and focus groups that a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2 should take place in the UK. Transparency of information, trust and the necessity to provide clear information on potential risks to study human challenge study participants were important. The perceived risks of taking part included the risk of developing long-term effects from COVID, impact on personal commitments and mental health implications of isolation. There were a number of practical realities to taking part that would influence a volunteer’s ability to participate (e.g. Wi-Fi, access to exercise, outside space and work, family and pet commitments). Conclusions: The results identified practical considerations for teams designing human challenge studies. Recommendations were grouped: 1) messaging to potential study participants, 2) review of the protocol and organisation of the study, and 3) more broadly, making the study more inclusive and relevant. This study highlights the value of public consultation in research, particularly in fields attracting public interest and scrutiny.

Funder

Wellcome

National Institute of Health Research

GCRF Networks in Vaccines Research and Development

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference29 articles.

1. Over 100,000 volunteers now registered for COVID-19 vaccine trials,2020

2. COVID-19 Living map of ongoing research 2020

3. Ethics of controlled human infection to address COVID-19.;S Shah;Science.,2020

4. Human challenge studies to accelerate coronavirus vaccine licensure.;N Eyal;J Infect Dis.,2020

5. SARS-CoV-2 controlled human infection models: Ethics, challenge agent production and regulatory issues.;M Baay;Biologicals.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3