Good participatory practice for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) research: the case of a COVID-19 prevention study

Author:

Perrone CarloORCID,Schilling WilliamORCID,Callery James J.ORCID,Ashley Elizabeth A.ORCID,Chambers MaryORCID,Chase HannahORCID,Dahal Piyush,Kanthawang Nipaphan,Nedsuwan Supalert,Hanboonkunupakarn Borimas,Intralawan Daranee,Karkey AbhilashaORCID,Mayxay MayfongORCID,Souvong Vimalay,Tran Minh Hien,Udas Shakya SummitaORCID,Sharma Sanjib KumarORCID,Uranw SurendraORCID,Vannachione Souphaphone,Woodrow CharlesORCID,White Nicholas J.ORCID,Cheah Phaik YeongORCID

Abstract

Background: The COPCOV study (chloroquine/ hydroxychloroquine prevention of coronavirus disease), which started recruitment in April 2020, is a multi-country double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial which is being conducted in healthcare facilities involved in COVID-19 case management. Participants are staff employed in facilities managing people with proven or suspected COVID-19. As part of the study, we conducted a series of engagement sessions. The aims were to assess the feasibility of the study, to identify context-specific ethical issues, to understand possible concerns, to fine tune research procedures and to refine the COPCOV information materials. Methods: The COPCOV study was approved by relevant institutional review boards. The sessions described in this paper were part of the study. We conducted a series of engagement sessions, each involving a short presentation of the study, a section where attendees were asked to express their willingness to participate in such a study, which information they would need to change their view and an open Q&A section. Answers were transcribed and coded into themes by two independent investigators. Themes were derived from the data. They complemented other site-specific engagement, communication, and public relation activities such as press releases and websites. Results and conclusions: From 16 th March 2020 to 20 th January 2021, 12 engagement sessions were conducted in Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Nepal and the UK involving 213 attendees in total. Issues raised revolved around the social value and study rationale; safety of trial medications and risk-benefit balance; study design and commitments. These sessions helped us identify  concerns people had, which helped us refine information materials as well as complement site feasibility assessments. Our experience strongly supports the use of participatory practices prior to conducting clinical trials.

Funder

COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference37 articles.

1. COVID-19 Primer

2. R&D Blueprint - novel Coronavirus - Good Participatory Practice for COVID-19 clinical trials: a toolbox.;L Schwartz,2020

3. Beyond recruitment: good participatory practice enhances the impact of research in a pandemic.;B Wilson;Nat Med.,2021

4. Good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials,2007

5. Good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials 2011,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3