Identifying Care Home Residents in Electronic Health Records - An OpenSAFELY Short Data Report

Author:

Schultze AnnaORCID,Bates Chris,Cockburn Jonathan,MacKenna Brian,Nightingale EmilyORCID,Curtis Helen J,Hulme William JORCID,Morton Caroline E,Croker RichardORCID,Bacon Seb,McDonald Helen IORCID,Rentsch Christopher TORCID,Bhaskaran Krishnan,Mathur RohiniORCID,Tomlinson Laurie AORCID,Williamson Elizabeth JORCID,Forbes Harriet,Tazare JohnORCID,Grint Daniel JORCID,Walker Alex J,Inglesby Peter,DeVito Nicholas JORCID,Mehrkar Amir,Hickman George,Davy Simon,Ward Tom,Fisher Louis,Evans David,Wing Kevin,Wong Angel YSORCID,McManus Robert,Parry JohnORCID,Hester Frank,Harper Sam,Evans Stephen JW,Douglas Ian J,Smeeth LiamORCID,Eggo Rosalind M,Goldacre Ben

Abstract

Background: Care home residents have been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic Health Records (EHR) hold significant potential for studying the healthcare needs of this vulnerable population; however, identifying care home residents in EHR is not straightforward. We describe and compare three different methods for identifying care home residents in the newly created OpenSAFELY-TPP data analytics platform.  Methods: Working on behalf of NHS England, we identified individuals aged 65 years or older potentially living in a care home on the 1st of February 2020 using (1) a complex address linkage, in which cleaned GP registered addresses were matched to old age care home addresses using data from the Care and Quality Commission (CQC); (2) coded events in the EHR; (3) household identifiers, age and household size to identify households with more than 3 individuals aged 65 years or older as potential care home residents. Raw addresses were not available to the investigators. Results: Of 4,437,286 individuals aged 65 years or older, 2.27% were identified as potential care home residents using the complex address linkage, 1.96% using coded events, 3.13% using household size and age and 3.74% using either of these methods. 53,210 individuals (32.0% of all potential care home residents) were classified as care home residents using all three methods. Address linkage had the largest overlap with the other methods; 93.3% of individuals identified as care home residents using the address linkage were also identified as such using either coded events or household age and size.  Conclusion: We have described the partial overlap between three methods for identifying care home residents in EHR, and provide detailed instructions for how to implement these in OpenSAFELY-TPP to support research into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care home residents.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference22 articles.

1. Deaths involving COVID-19 in the care sector, England and Wales

2. Covid-19 and lack of linked datasets for care homes.;B Hanratty;BMJ.,2020

3. Identifying who lives in a care home-a challenge to be conquered.;J Burton;Age Ageing.,2018

4. Vivaldi 1: coronavirus (COVID-19) care homes study report

5. COVID-19 infection and attributable mortality in UK care homes: Cohort study using active surveillance and electronic records (March-June 2020).;P Dutey-Magni;medRxiv.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3