Utilising blood-derived products for guided tissue regeneration in periradicular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Baniulyte Gabriele,Burns LornaORCID,Ali KamranORCID

Abstract

Background Since 1982, guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has become increasingly popular. The recent progress in GTR research focuses on the application of blood-derived products. However, no comprehensive systematic review has been conducted to assess its effectiveness specifically in periradicular surgery. Therefore, the aim of this review was to analyse the outcomes of periradicular with GTR using blood-derived products compared to standard periradicular surgery. Methods This review was based on randomised controlled trials comparing periradicular surgery in conjunction with GTR with blood-derived products and the standard periapical surgery. The databases searched included Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, with the most recent search conducted on December 16th, 2022. Additionally, reference lists of similar systematic reviews were examined, while international trials registries and repositories were consulted for unpublished studies. Two blinded independent reviewers carried out the screening and the included studies underwent critical appraisal. The findings are reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results A total of 261 publications were initially reviewed based on their title and abstract, resulting in seventeen studies that underwent full-text screening. At this stage, 14 studies were excluded, leaving three randomised controlled trials to be included. These trials involved a total of 85 patients. A meta-analysis was conducted for the outcome of healing. The overall treatment effect was 0.78 (95% CI 0.18 to 3.34), indicating a preference towards the control group. Conclusion Based on a meta-analysis of three studies, there was no statistically significant distinction observed in terms of healing between the GTR involving blood-derived products and standard procedure groups. However, critical appraisal revealed indirectness and imprecision, resulting in a certainty rating of 'low'. Thus, additional robust evidence is necessary to support the utilisation of blood-derived products in GTR techniques to enhance periradicular surgery outcomes. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD42020222663.

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference50 articles.

1. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease.;S Nyman;J Clin Periodontol.,1982

2. Rationale for the application of the GTR principle using a barrier membrane in endodontic surgery: a proposal of classification and literature review.;T von Arx;Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.,2001

3. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature.;I Tsesis;J Endod.,2013

4. Comparisons of periodontal regenerative therapies: A meta-analysis on the long-term efficacy.;Y Wu;J Clin Periodontol.,2017

5. Guided Bone Regeneration with Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.;B Wessing;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3