Better treatment response in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder is associated with more use of a planning-focused coping style

Author:

Kirkham ElizabethORCID,Cao Yintao,Król Martyna

Abstract

Background Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common and highly disabling mental health condition. Although effective treatments such as cognitive behavioural therapy are available, a substantial minority of patients do not respond to treatment, and those who do often experience relapse. There is an urgent need to understand more about the psychological factors involved in response to OCD treatment. Prior literature suggests that poorer treatment response may be related to higher levels of early life stress and experiential avoidance, while better treatment response may be related to positive coping styles (planning; active coping). Methods Individuals with OCD (n = 202) took part in an online survey in which they reported what OCD treatment they had received, and how their OCD symptoms at the time of the survey compared to their OCD symptoms before they had received any treatment. They also completed measures of OCD severity, early life stress, experiential avoidance, planning and active coping. Depression and anxiety were measured as control variables. Results It was found that more severe OCD symptoms were associated with higher levels of early life stress and more use of experiential avoidance, but were unrelated to planning or active coping. On the other hand, a better self-reported response to OCD treatment was associated with more use of the planning style of coping, but was not associated with early life stress, experiential avoidance or active coping. Conclusions The present study highlights planning-focused coping as a possible modifiable factor in maximising treatment response in people with OCD. Given that sustained recovery from OCD is relatively rare, research that focuses on how to maximise the benefit of existing treatments could have a significant impact on individuals living with the condition.

Funder

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3