Abstract
Background Problematic Hypersexuality (PH) is defined as a distress caused by hypersexuality, to the extent that seeking treatment is considered. PH was previously measured with instruments stemming from different perspectives on problems related to hypersexuality. These instruments might best be analyzed in unison to discover the most optimal set of characteristics to measure PH. Methods A total of 58 items were investigated with Item Response Theory (IRT). We included 1211 participants (592 women, 618 men, 1 other) from a representative Dutch general population sample of 18 years or older. In addition, 371 participants (116 women, 253 men, 2 other) in a web-based survey who sought information on their current level of PH were included. This latter group was divided into those that did or did not consider treatment and group differences in item averages were assessed. Results After item selection, 26 out of 58 items were retained and divided in two scales: Emotion Dysregulation-PH – 9 items representing the distressing emotional patterns coinciding with hypersexual preoccupation – and Negative Effects-PH – 17 items representing the negative consequences of patterns of hypersexual thoughts and behavior. Assumptions for IRT analyses were met (unidimensionality, local independence and monotonicity). After an IRT graded response model was fit, the scales showed sufficient reliability for the target population of hypersexual individuals. In the general population the scales showed large floor effects and were less reliable. Conclusions With this study a first step is taken in validating two complementary item banks to measure PH. Further development of the item banks should include the investigation of responsiveness. New items should be constructed to assess less-explored areas of PH and improve differentiating power of the scales. This study showed that diagnostic accuracy for PH is currently difficult to attain with a survey, even when using an extended item set representing the most unique characteristics of PH.
Funder
Horizon Europe Framework Programme
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Reference58 articles.
1. Shame reduction, affect regulation, and sexual boundary development: essential building blocks of sexual addiction treatment.;K Adams;Sex Addict Compulsivity.,2001
2. Development and diagnostic accuracy of a shortened dutch naming test for people with aphasia using item response theory.;E Alons;Arch Clin Neuropsychol.,2022
3. Sexual addiction, sexual compulsivity, sexual impulsivity, or what? toward a theoretical model.;J Bancroft;J Sex Res.,2004
4. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.;D Beaton;Spine (Phila Pa 1976).,2000
5. The development of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale (CSBD-19): an ICD-11 based screening measure across three languages.;B Bőthe;J Behav Addict.,2020