Scientific and ethical challenges of brain chimeras converge on an ‘enriched’ approach

Author:

Boyd J. LomaxORCID

Abstract

Transplantation of human brain organoids into nonhuman animals has the potential to advance our molecular understanding of human cognition. Yet hybridized nervous systems raise novel scientific and ethical questions that appear to be oriented toward opposing ends – as models become more sophisticated, ethical concerns become more salient. I posit that scientific and ethical challenges arising from interspecies human brain engraftment may be akin to ‘birds of a feather’ that are more entangled, rather than in tension. The scientific value of engrafted organoids depends on the extent to which they provide insights into human neurobiology, while ethical concerns tend to focus on the wellbeing of engrafted animals. Based on a synthesis of empirical and theoretical evidence from neuroscience and philosophical bioethics, respectively, I argue that scientific and ethical challenges converge on a shared interest in achieving the fullest possible maturation of the host animal. The conditions which are favorable to the wellbeing of animals are also consistent with factors that contribute to the elaboration of neuronal features during development and later behavioral traits. Treating engrafted animals as if they already possess higher moral status may, in fact, be necessary for them to develop the neuronal, cognitive, and behavioral traits that are most relevant to our understanding of the human brain. Studies have shown that enriched environments provide the conditions for neurons to mature, more fully, into neural circuits that contribute to complex behaviors, while supporting the wellbeing and individuation of animals. I conceptualize an ‘enriched’ approach toward research using interspecies brain engraftment and offer a case study examining how enriched environments can be used to study the neurobiology of human speech circuits in grafted animals. The uncertainties posed by interspecies brain engraftment illustrates how joint consideration of scientific and ethical perspectives can reveal convergent pathways for advancing human brain research.

Funder

Kavli Foundation

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3