FLEXIBLE EXAMINATION AS A PATHWAY TO LEARNING

Author:

Diedrichs Peter1,Willen Lundgren Berit1,Karlsudd Peter1

Affiliation:

1. Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden

Abstract

Previous research in the field of educational development has highlighted the importance of examination in the learning process. In most educational contexts tests and grades are the most important influences on the students’ learning strategies. A well planned examination strategy is seen as contributing to better learning. A test of flexible examination forms was carried out in the Linnaeus University’s teacher training program in Sweden. During a course in special needs education, 119 teacher trainees were given the opportunity to choose examination method at the start of the course. They were able to choose between four different examination methods and were in addition allowed to propose their own examination method. After the students had been examined they completed an evaluation on their newly acquired and previous examination experience and with the key question being which form of examination was most beneficial to the learning process. The results show that even if the students saw examination as an opportunity for learning and appreciated the option of freely choosing examination method, they did not choose the examination form according to its benefit for the learning process. On the contrary they chose the examination form that they expected to be the easiest path towards high grades. Key words: assessment, assessment system, examination, flexible examination, learning process.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference17 articles.

1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman

2. Biggs, J. B., Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York, Academic Press.

3. Chickering, W. A., & Gamson, F. Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (7), 2-6.

4. Dysthe, O. (2007). How a reform affects writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (2), 237-252.

5. Jokela, P., & Karlsudd, P. (2007). Thesis web dialogue. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 1 (1).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3