Affiliation:
1. University of Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
Abstract
This study was conducted to i) ascertain the validity, reliability, and feasibility of a module based on the socioscientific issue approach and design thinking model (SIA-DT), and ii) assess its effects on the entrepreneurial creative thinking (ECT) in STEM education. The first phase of ECT module validation was conducted with the assistance of three expert evaluators and 32 students. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and the ECT test were used to collect data. The second phase consists of evaluation using a quasi-experimental design with a Pre-Post Test of Non-Equivalent Control Groups. A total of 64 Form Four students were divided into two groups: SIA-DT (n = 32) and control (n = 32). The ECT module has a high validity value and an acceptable Cronbach's alpha reliability of .92. The ECT Module's feasibility was substantiated by a mean score of 4.71. The results of the independent-sample t-test prove that there is a significant difference in the post-test for students in the SIA-DT group compared to the control group in ECT and five constructs of ECT. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that the ECT Module is valid, reliable, and feasible in STEM education and that it is effective in enhancing students' ECT.
Keywords: design thinking model, entrepreneurial creative thinking, module development, socioscientific issue approach, STEM education
Reference34 articles.
1. Ahmad, J. (2022). Kesan pendekatan isu sosiosaintifik berbantukan peta pemikiran roda terhadap pemikiran sains keusahawanan dan sifat ingin tahu terhadap STEM [The impact of the socio-scientific issue approach aided by the concept map on entrepreneurial scientific thinking and curiosity towards STEM]. Doctoral Thesis, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287805
3. Aung, K, T., Razak, R, A., & Nazry, N, N. M. (2021). Establishing validity and reliability of semi-structured interview questionnaire in developing risk communication module: A pilot study. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 600-606.
4. Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/593884
5. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412958806.n258
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献