TWENTY-TWO YEARS OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION RESEARCH: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Author:

Balcı Emre Vadi1ORCID,Duğan Özlem1ORCID,Cavas Bulent2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Uşak University, Türkiye

2. Dokuz Eylül University-Uşak University, Türkiye

Abstract

In recent years, the number of academic studies in the field of science communication has increased. It is important to make a general examination of the studies on science communication and to reveal their distribution according to years and countries in order to draw the framework of science communication studies. The main aim of this study was to analyze the science communication-based articles published in journals in the Web of Science (WoS) index in the last 22 years. Within the scope of the study, articles were scanned by typing keywords such as "topic", "title", "keywords" science communication from the WoS database and 322 articles were examined by bibliometric analysis method. As a result of the study, the articles published between 2000 and 2022 were examined according to years, countries, funding organizations, research area, publishing houses, country scores and citations. According to the results, most articles were published in 2022(N = 58); USA, UK, Australia, Germany ranked first with the number of articles and SAGE (N = 74) ranked first in publisher distributions. This study offers a global perspective on science communication and proposes a vision for future research. Keywords: Bibliometrics analysis, journal articles, research trends, science communication, Web of Science (WoS)

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference63 articles.

1. Abersek, B., & Abersek, M. K. (2010). Development of communication training paradigm for engineers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(2), 99-108. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1405171312.pdf

2. Akcan, C., Dogan, M., & Ablak, S. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on 21st century skills in education. Journal of Gazi University Gazi Education Faculty, 43(1), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1111443

3. Akerlof, K. L., Timm, K. M. F., Rowan, K. E., Olds, J. L., & Hathaway, J. (2022) The growth and disciplinary convergence of environmental communication: A bibliometric analysis of the field (1970–2019). Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.814599

4. Akoglu, U. O. (2010). Science communication: Its importance, methods, tools and TUBITAK's science and society studies, chief specialist thesis. TUBITAK Directorate of Popular Science Publications.

5. Akoglu, A. (2011). Science communication. Science and Technology, 310, 24-30. https://e-dergi.tubitak.gov.tr/edergi/yazi.pdf?dergiKodu=4&cilt=44&sayi=743&sayfa=24&yaziid=32090

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3