MEASURING SCIENTIFIC REASONING OF FOURTH GRADERS: VALIDATION OF THE SCIENCE-K INVENTORY IN PAPER-BASED AND COMPUTER-BASED TESTING ENVIRONMENTS

Author:

Nagy Márió Tibor1ORCID,Korom Erzsébet1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Szeged, Hungary

Abstract

Nowadays, the assessment of student performance has become increasingly technology-based, a trend that can also be observed in the evaluation of scientific reasoning, with more and more of the formerly paper-based assessment tools moving into the digital space. The study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the paper-based and computer-based forms of the Science-K Inventory, which assesses children's scientific reasoning in three aspects: experimentation, data interpretation, and understanding of the nature of science. The pilot study involved 84 fourth-grade Hungarian students, with 39 students taking the paper-based test and 45 students taking the computer-based test. Rasch measurements and reliability tests have indicated that both the paper-based and computer-based test versions are equally valid for assessing the scientific reasoning skills of fourth graders. Students achieved high test scores in both mediums, and there were no significant differences between boys' and girls' scientific reasoning in either test type. The novelty of this research was that the Science-K Inventory had not yet been tested in a computer-based format. The results demonstrate that the Science-K Inventory can be effectively utilized in digital testing to provide teachers with rapid and valuable information for fostering the development of their students' scientific reasoning. Keywords: computer-based testing, paper-based testing, primary school, Science-K Inventory, scientific reasoning

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference59 articles.

1. Adanır, G. A., Akmatbekova, A., & Muhametjanova, G. (2020). Longitudinal study of Kyrgyz students’ general physics course performance in paper-based versus online–based tests. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4197–4210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10175-7

2. Bennett, R. E. (2003). Online assessment and the comparability of score meaning (ETS-RM-03-05). Educational Testing Service.

3. Björnsson, J. K. (2008). Changing Icelandic national testing from traditional paper and pencil to computer-based assessment: Some background, challenges, and problems to overcome. In F. Scheuermann & A. Guimaraes Pereira (Eds.), Towards a research agenda in computer-based assessment: Challenges and needs for European Educational Measurement (pp. 6–9). European Communities.

4. Brallier, S. A., Schwanz, K. A., Palm, L. J., & Irwin, L. N. (2015). Online testing: Comparison of online and classroom exams in an upper-level psychology course. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-2-20

5. Bullock, M., & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences. In F. E. Weinert, & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich longitudinal study (pp. 38–54). Cambridge University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3