Affiliation:
1. University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract
The research deals with the development of cognitive process dimensions in economic education. The aim is to research factors that influence academic achievement of students according to their intellectual level and grades. The researchers used quantitative design of research based on standardized assessment of intelligence and non-standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire was used to analyse the pedagogical competences of the teachers of economic subjects from the students' point of view in close relation to the teaching management and the impact on the motivation to learn and the achievement of students in these subjects. The respondents were 277 Czech students aged 16-17 who were divided into groups according to their intellectual level and grades. The data were analysed by a correlation analysis and a multiple regression model. In conclusion, the following can be stated: (a) From the point of view of the above average intelligent students, expertise can be considered as an important competency of the teacher; teaching average intelligent students, communication and presentation skills seem to be important. (b) It is desirable to develop cognitive processes, critical thinking actively, to lead students to become aware of changes in their own thinking and to orient them towards mastery goals. (c) Particularly for students with weaker results it is necessary to create intrinsic motivation, which develops cognition and thus is able to develop higher cognitive dimensions further. The links between these areas are of utmost importance for education and, above all, for developing of students' scholarship. Each student can be educated, and it is necessary to influence them to develop their personality and all of their potential abilities. The conceptual four-sector model represents the initial pathway to lead students who are differentiated according to the intellectual level and academic achievement to the active development of thinking, learning and critical insight.
Keywords: cognitive process dimensions, abstract visual thinking, intellectual level, motivation to learn, academic achievement.
Reference46 articles.
1. Al-Baddareen, Ghaith, S., & Akour, M. (2015). Self-Efficacy, achievement goals and metacognition as predicators of academic motivation. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 19, 2068-2073.
2. Anderson, L. W., & Kratwohl, P. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching a assessing of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
3. Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46 (2), 26-29.
4. Barak, M., Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353–369.
5. Barrett, E., & Moore, S. (2012). An introduction to problem-based learning. In Barret, E., & Moore, S. (Eds.), New approaches to problem-based learning: Revitalizing your practice in higher education (pp. 3-17). New York: Routledge.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献