Affiliation:
1. Hacettepe University, Turkey
Abstract
Knowledge concerning continuously improving branches of science such as biotechnology in particular is difficult to be understood properly by students, or they learn it incorrectly. One of the most important reasons for this is that students cannot associate in their mind the relevant concepts. The aim of this research is to determine prospective biology teachers’ conceptual framework of biotechnology, and thus determining their cognitive structure. The data were collected from 34 prospective biology teachers. Considering the fact that these prospective biology teachers had taken biotechnology course previously, they were selected on the basis of volunteering. Word association test and draw-and-write technique were used in collecting the data. The data obtained were organised on the basis of qualitative content analysis. Then the data were grouped into 7 categories (methods/techniques, biotechnology applications, genetics, other branches of science, organisms, meaning attributed to biotechnology, laboratory) according to word association test, and into 4 categories (methods/techniques, biotechnology applications, genetics, organisms) according to draw-and-write technique. According to the research findings, almost half of the prospective teachers had correct and appropriate associations for biotechnology, whereas a considerable part of them did not have adequate conceptual associations. Also, it was found that prospective teachers had misconceptions about biotechnology.
Key words: teaching of biotechnology, cognitive structure, draw-and-write technique, word association test.
Reference47 articles.
1. Anderson, O. R. (1992). Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 29, 1037-1058.
2. Aydın, F., & Taşar, M.F. (2010). An investigation of pre-service science teachers’ cognitive structures and ideas about the nature of technology. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 11 (4), 209-221.
3. Backett-Milburn, K., & Mckie, L. (1999). A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 14 (3), 387–398.
4. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 84–86.
5. Bahar, M., & Kılıçlı, F. (2001). Kelime ilişkilendirme testi yöntemi ile Atatürk ilkeleri arasındaki bağların araştırılması [Investigation of the relationship between the principles of Ataturk with the word association test method]. X. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献