NEW NATURAL SCIENCE LITERACIES OF ONLINE RESEARCH AND COMPREHENSION: TO TEACH OR NOT TO TEACH

Author:

Kordigel Aberšek Metka1,Dolenc Kosta1,Flogie Andrej2,Koritnik Ana3

Affiliation:

1. University Maribor, Slovenia

2. Institute Anton Martin Slomšek, Slovenia

3. Compulsory School Miklavž, Slovenia

Abstract

This study describes a research focused on science teachers’ evaluation of natural science literacy of research and comprehension competence in their students. Natural science literacy of research and comprehension competence is defined as an essential part of science literacy – as a competence to find, evaluate and use science knowledge stored on the Internet (as a part of extended memory) to solve a problem in a science class and to construct students’ own science knowledge. Online science literacy was defined in terms of the following aspects: basic skills (which include computer basics, web searching basics, and general navigation basics), locating information, finding a suitable website, locating the information on the website, critically evaluating the information according to its reliability and according to its relevance for the science class assessment. The data were collected through a 53-item Likert – scale questionnaire. The items were adopted from the TICA questionnaire for assessing students’ general online reading competence. Science teachers from 5 different levels of pre-university education assessed their students’ online science literacy in order to evaluate their students’ competence to use the Internet as a storage and as a source of knowledge for teaching/learning process in the science class, to re-evaluate their online teaching practice and the need for implementation of natural science literacy of research and comprehension competence in their science curriculum. Key words: ICT, Internet in natural science education, natural science literacy of research and comprehension competence.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference42 articles.

1. Aberšek, B., Borstner, B., & Bregant, J. (2014). The virtual science teacher as a hybrid system: Cognitive science hand in hand with cybernetic pedagogy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13 (1), 75-90.

2. Aberšek, B. (2013). Cogito Ergo Sum Homomachine? Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12 (3), 268-270.

3. Alvermann, D. E., Hutchins, R. J., & McDevitt, R. (2012). Adolescents’ engagement with Web 2.0 and social media: Research, theory, and practice. Research in the Schools, 19 (1), 33 – 44.

4. Anderson, R. (1994). Role of readers’ schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In Ruddell, R.B, Ruddell, M.R. & Singer, H. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 448-468). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

5. Baker, E. (2010). The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3