Affiliation:
1. University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
Abstract
Chemical models are indispensable tool in chemistry class and enable secondary school pupils to develop complex thought processes and spatial concepts, both of which are necessary to improve their understanding of chemical concepts.
In this research, special emphasis is given to complex competencies not only their acquisition, but rather how pupils develop them. For this purpose, a learning strategy has been developed, called learning by self-generating chemical models. Pupils learn individually on their own models, which are made from easily accessible, low-cost materials.
The impact of workable models was investigated (assembly of commercial models and production of self-made models) on the (1) learning success using simple molecule shapes and (2) the degree of competence development which realized through the implemented activities. The study involved first-year secondary school-pupils, defined as self-creators of paper- and -wire models (experimental group) and assemblers of commercial models (called the control group). The appearance of the molecules being studied took the form of geometric shapes and structures, which pupils present by making of ball-, called wire-models from plasticine and wire or paper created, called paper models.
Based on the results of statistical processing of the data, we found that self-creation of models (as an innovative approach) leads to better understanding and to subsequently sustained knowledge for the pupil. It should also be noted that pupils who were self-generators in comparisons to those who merely assembled the models, generally developed many complex skills in the areas of problem solving, practical competence, mathematical competence and critical thinking skills. The knowledge so acquired was also better understood.
Key words: chemical models, competencies, self-made models, teaching and learning by models.
Reference20 articles.
1. Barber, J. (2011). Teaching about how scientists use models with planetary scientist. University of California, Delta education. Retrieved 12/04/2012 from http://www.deltaeducation.com/downloads/samples_seeds/1356095_SG_PM_Planetary_Scientist.pdf.
2. Bent, A., H. (1984). Uses (and abuses) of models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61 (9), 774-777.
3. Devetak, I., Hajzeri, M., Glažar, A., S., & Vogrinec, J. (2010). The influence of Different Models on 15-years old Students' Understanding of the Solid State of Matter. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 57, 904-511.
4. Ferk-Savec, V. (2000). The impact of different molecular structure representations on the process of perception, rotation and reflection. Master’s Thesis, Ljubljana.
5. Ferk-Savec, V., Vrtačnik, M., Gilbert, K., J. & Peklaj, C. (2006). In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers’ Opinion on the Use of Models in Teaching Chemistry. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 53, 381-390.