Affiliation:
1. Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia
2. State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Abstract
The Creative Responsibility Based Teaching (CRBT) model is an innovative physics-teaching model designed to enhance students’ scientific creativity and responsibility. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the effectiveness of CRBT model to improve scientific creativity and first year students’ responsibility on Basic Physics learning in academic year 2016/2017. This research used one group pre-test and post-test design on 144 students divided into 4 groups at University of Lambung Mangkurat, South Kalimantan (Indonesia). The data collection methods were conducted by using: scientific creativity tests emphasized on unusual uses indicator, problem finding, product improvement, creatively science problem solving, creatively experiment designing, and creatively product design; questionnaire of responsibility emphasized on: participatory indicator, respecting others, cooperation, leadership, and delivering opinion; and interviews. The data analysis technique was done by using paired t-test / Wilcoxon test, n-gain, and ANOVA / Kruskal-Wallis test. The results showed that there was a significant increase in students’ scientific creativity and responsibility at α = 5%, with n-gain average of moderate category, and both were not different (consistent) for all four groups. Thus, the CRBT model is effective for enhancing students’ scientific creativity and responsibility.
Keywords: creative responsibility based teaching, physics learning, responsibility attitude, scientific creativity, first year students.
Reference65 articles.
1. ADB. (2014). Creative productivity index: Analyzing creativity and innovation in Asia. A report by the economist intelligence unit for the Asian Development Bank August 2014. The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. and Asian Development Bank.
2. Aktamis, H., & Ergin, O. (2008). The effect scientific process skills education on student’s scientific creativity, science attitudes, and academic achievement. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science learning and Teaching, 9 (1), 1-21.
3. Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.
4. Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205.
5. Bakir, S., & Oztekin, E. (2014). Creative thinking levels of preservice science teachers in terms of different variables. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13 (2), 231-242.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献