WRITING VERSUS TYPING DURING SCIENCE TEACHING: CASE STUDY IN SLOVENIA

Author:

Kordigel Aberšek Metka1,Aberšek Boris1,Flogie Andrej1

Affiliation:

1. University of Maribor, Slovenia

Abstract

In a case study conducted in a biology class in Slovenia, six grade students participated in a biology project Writing Versus Typing in a Biology Class. The final task in this project was to write a chapter for a biology textbook with the title Urtica dioica. The task was performed twice: firstly, the text was written by the hand and secondly it was typed on the computer keyboard. Handwritten and keyboard typed scientific texts, textbook chapters, were compared with the special focus on the lexical, syntactic, and semantic level of the text. The purpose of this research was to find out the effect of replacing handwriting with typing in the process of teaching/learning science subjects, where the understanding of texts is of crucial importance. A closer look at the students’ text products in the typing modality reveals that students, while typing, seem to be cognitively overloaded. One of the consequences of this is a lower level of cognitive achievement in their typed text: students show less knowledge, less terminological accuracy, and, above all, a lesser understanding of the interconnection between the items of information provided. Keywords: biology science class; embodied cognition, handwriting, keyboard writing.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference32 articles.

1. Calvo, P., & Gomila, A. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

2. Cornu, B. (2011). Digital Natives: How do they learn? How to teach them? Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies.

3. DeStefano, D., & Le Fevre, J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23 (3), 1616-1641.

4. Fisher, D, Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2009). In a reading state of mind. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

5. Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). Action as a binding key to multisensory integration. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (Eds.). The handbook of multisensory process (425-441). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effect sizes of writing modality on K-6 students’ writing and reading performance: a meta-analysis;The Australian Educational Researcher;2023-12-18

2. Secondary Teachers’ Remote Instructional Practices in Mathematics for Students With Disabilities;Journal of Special Education Technology;2022-02-21

3. Hygienic Assessment of Digital Writing: A Bio-Cybernetic Approach. Report I;ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT;2021-10

4. Evaluation of the ‘Feedback Engagement Enhancement Tool’ to examine and enhance students’ engagement with feedback on their writing;Studies in Educational Evaluation;2020-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3