Affiliation:
1. Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia
Abstract
Physics education is an easy job, making people happy. It is an easy job for all, including teachers and learners. Do you agree? I do, but probably it is good to try to discuss these words somehow in details.
Quite often we see, even in our Journal, research results proving that Physics is not so popular. Physics courses require thinking, using correct words, not making too much algebra and calculation mistakes, using arguments. Really, a reasonable portion of pupils does not find Physics lessons as a source of happiness. What to do with these pupils, their teachers and the content they are taught? Neuroscientists, like M. Lieberman, are converging to interesting ideas: “Teachers are losing the education war because our adolescents are distracted by the social world. Naturally, the students don’t see it that way. It wasn’t their choice to get endless instruction on topics that don’t seem relevant to them. They desperately want to learn, but what they want to learn about is their social world - how it works and how they can secure a place in it that will maximize their social rewards and minimize the social pain they feel. Their brains are built to feel these strong social motivations and to use the mentalizing system to help them along. Evolutionarily, the social interest of adolescents is no distraction. Rather, it is the most important thing they can learn well.” (Lieberman 2013, p.282)
Reference11 articles.
1. Cloninger, R. C. (2013). What makes people healthy, happy, and fulfilled in the face of current world challenges? Mens Sana Monographs, 11 (1), 16-24. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.109288.
2. Demkanin, P. (2013). Preparation of new physics teachers from various perspectives. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12 (1), 4-5.
3. Demkanin, P., & Gergeľová, B. (2017). Development of aptitude for team work via physics education. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 1804. American Institute of Physics Inc. doi: 10.1063/1.4974380.
4. Demkanin, P., & Velanová, M. (2016). Kľúčové tézy obsahu prírodovedného vzdelávania ako kritérium výberu obsahu pre prírodovedné kurikulum [Key theoretical thesis of the content of science education as a criterion for choosing content for the science curriculum]. In Held, Ľ. Východiská prípravy prírodovedného kurikula pre základnú školu 2020 II (pp. 21-44). Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis.
5. Demkaninová, D. (2015). Osobnosť v kontexte ADHD [Personality in the context of ADHD]. In Herényiová, G. ADHD v bio-psycho-sociálnom kontexte. Bratislava: Psychoprof.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献