Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
2. Armenian State Pedagogical University after Kh. Abovyan, Armenia
Abstract
Nowadays, nearly all the specialists have to operate in unpredictable situations. The group leader has to be capable to realize effective group performance. As it has been already mentioned (Bazarov, Shevchenko, 2013), “The post-crisis era executive leader should possess such important traits as self adjustment; common sense in combination with intuition, emotions, and imagination; and the readiness to make choices in fifty-fifty situations. The most general definition of “self-adjustment” is the building of functional interconnections between (1) a subject’s actions and state and (2) the actions and state of the surrounding setting. Building such interconnections allows for introducing relevant and purposeful changes in the subject’s actions, depending on the feedback from the previous step. In other words, this is an algorithm of changes based on feedback. ”. So in our opinion, a framework is needed that integrates existing team leadership research and the full range of ways in which leadership can manifest itself within the team.
1. Four types of organization of joint activities predict the facet of the organizational culture
2. Four types of organizational culture give rise to four types of working groups
3. Four types of organizational culture assume four types of leadership as well
4. The essential difference between these cultures is determined by those forms of organization of joint activities which underlies them.
Key words: organizational culture, joint activity, type of working group, team leadership.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference10 articles.
1. Bazarov, T. Yu. (2012). Social psychology of instability within organizational reality. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 5, 271-288. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2012.0016
2. Bazarov, T. Yu., & Shevchenko, Yu. S. ( 2013). The executive leader in the postcrisis era. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6 (2), 4-19.
3. Bazarov, T. Yu., (n.d.). Psychological aspects of an organization undergoing changes. Moscow: Aspekt- Press.
4. Cameron, K. S., & Ettigton, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon, p. 356-396.
5. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Addison Wesley Logman.