Abstract
The most important source of knowledge in primary school teaching is the textbook. This research aimed to determine the differences in graphic illustrations in the contents of natural sciences in a regular textbook and a textbook for children with special educational needs in the Republic of Serbia. As the number of subjects that deal with the contents of natural sciences for children with special educational needs is small, as well as the number of schools that implement this type of teaching, physics is taken as a subject, because the number of common topics is quite similar. The research aim was to analyze illustrations in selected physics textbooks for the 6th grade of primary education, by the criteria for dividing illustrations by types, for determining abstractness and relative representation of illustrations. In addition, a supplementary classification of illustrations was applied. The obtained results indicate that the number of illustrations concerning the number of words is higher in textbooks for children with special educational needs, as well as that the most represented are illustrations from everyday life and greater abstraction compared to regular textbooks. Since the physics textbook for children with disabilities is quite old, these results can be examined in practice among teachers and help future textbook authors to write the best quality textbook taking into account the needs of teachers and children with special educational needs. Keywords: image analysis, teaching physics, type of illustrations, special educational needs
Reference16 articles.
1. Chatman, L., & Sparrow, B. (2011). The feeling of doing across levels of analysis - The effect of perceived control on learning. Horizons of Psychology, 20(3), 73-91.
2. Ciborowski, J. (1992). Textbooks and the students who can't read them: A guide for the teaching of content. Brookline.
3. Čaluković, N. (2013). Fizika, udžbenik za 6. Razred osnovne škole [Physics, textbook for 6. Elementary school class]. Krug.
4. Dimopoulos, L., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025006310503
5. Gajtanović, Z., & Vait, D. I. (2015). Analiza udžbenika matematike za treći razred osnovne škole prema standardima D-grupe. [Analysis of mathematics textbooks for the third grade of elementary school according to d-group standards]. Zbornik radova Učiteljskog fakulteta, 9, 263-288. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrufpl1509263G
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献