Systematic scoping review protocol of Stroke Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (SPSE)

Author:

Roudini Juliet1,Weschke Sarah1,Rackoll Torsten1,Dirnagl Ulrich1,Guyatt Gordon2,Khankeh Hamidreza3

Affiliation:

1. Berlin Institute of Health: Berlin Institute of Health at Charite

2. : McMaster University Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact

3. Karolinska Institutet

Abstract

Abstract This protocol describes a systematic scoping review of Stroke Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (SPSE), concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, or frameworks. The active engagement of patients and other stakeholders is increasingly acknowledged as essential to patient-centered research to answer questions of importance to patients and their caregivers. Stroke is a debilitating, long-lasting burden for individuals, their families, and healthcare professionals. They require rehabilitation services, health care system assistance, and social support. Their difficulties are unique and require the continued involvement of all parties involved. Understanding SPSE in research is fundamental to healthcare planning and extends the role of patients and stakeholders beyond that of the study subject. We will conduct a systematic literature search to identify the types of existing evidence related to SPSE, implementation strategies, indicators, or frameworks related to Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (PSE), clarify key concepts, definitions, and components of SPSE, compile experiences and prerequisites and identifying stroke research internationally. Two independent reviewers will extract data from selected studies onto a customized extraction form that has already been piloted. We integrate existing knowledge to address gaps in the literature on SPSE research by presenting the model, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks for stroke patients. We hope that these findings will offer future researchers a clear picture and conceptual model of SPSE.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. Abelson J, Forest P, Eyles J, Smith P. … E. M.-S. science &, & 2003, undefined. (n.d.). Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Elsevier. Retrieved August 3, 2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795360200343X

2. Abma T, …, health CN-Q. & 2009, undefined. (2009). Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Journals.Sagepub.Com, 19(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309331869

3. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey H;Int J Social Res Methodology: Theory Pract,2005

4. Arksey H, research L. O.-I. journal of social, & 2005, undefined. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Taylor & Francis, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

5. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review;Brett JM;Wiley Online Library,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3