Engaging with art in-the-wild at the Barnes Foundation and Penn Museum

Author:

Darda Kohinoor M.1,Gonzalez Vicente Estrada1,Christensen Alexander P.2,Bobrow Isabella1,Krimm Amy1,Nasim Zuha1,Cardillo Eileen R.1,Perthes William3,Chatterjee Anjan1

Affiliation:

1. University of Pennsylvania

2. Vanderbilt University

3. The Barnes Foundation

Abstract

Abstract

As cultural consumption increasingly moves to a digital space, it is crucial to understand the evolving landscape of art consumption both in and outside of a physical museum context. The current study delves into this contrast, seeking to understand how art is perceived and appreciated in museums and on a digital medium (like a computer screen). Across two experiments at the Barnes Foundation and Penn Museum in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, we explored how the aesthetic engagement of paintings and artifacts is influenced by the physical context in which an artwork is encountered and by the characteristics of the viewer. Our findings suggest that the cognitive and emotional impacts of artworks on viewers, as well as the viewers’ overall aesthetic experiences are comparable across physical museum spaces and digital platforms. However, participants reported gaining more understanding from art viewed in museums, compared to participants who viewed art in the lab. Art experience and openness to experience influenced aesthetic impacts and ratings differently in the museum and in the lab. Overall, routes to broader valuations of liking were more similar than different between the museum and lab contexts, whereas patterns of impacts that might lead to new knowledge or understanding gained differed between museum and lab contexts. As digital technologies are increasingly integrated into diverse processes in museums such as collections management, curation, exhibitions, and education and learning, our research highlights how museums can leverage digital expansion to achieve their missions as centers of learning and education.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference43 articles.

1. All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics;Augustin MD;Acta Psychologica,2012

2. Balbi, B., Protti, F., & Montanari, R. (2016). Driven by Caravaggio through his painting. Proceedings of the COGNITIVE.

3. Baumberger, C. (2013). Art and understanding. Defence of Aesthetic. Cognitivism. In Greenlee, M. et alii (Eds.), Bilder sehen. Perspektiven der Bildwissenschaft. Regensburg: Schnell + Steiner, 41–67.

4. Drawing on mind's canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non-artists;Bhattacharya J;Human brain mapping,2005

5. In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art;Brieber D;Acta Psychologica,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3