Affiliation:
1. University of Manchester
2. Robert Gordon University
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
With the increasing global burden of frailty on healthcare resources, it is important to understand the modifiable risk factors of frailty. This study examined perceived age discrimination as a potential risk factor for frailty progression and frailty development among older adults.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study using data from Waves 5 to 9 of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Data on perceived age discrimination was collected only in Wave 5 of ELSA and analysed as baseline data in this study. Frailty was defined using the Frailty Index (FI) scores (0 to 1), calculated using the multidimensional deficits (scores ≥ 0.25 were considered frail). Binomial generalised estimating equation models (GEE) were fitted in R studio using perceived age discrimination as the main predictor with age, gender, long-standing illness, cognition, socioeconomic status (SES) as covariates. Odd ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
A total sample of 2,385 ELSA participants were included in the analysis. 55.8% (n = 1312) were female, mean age 71.9 (SD ± 5.27) years and baseline frailty prevalence was 12.1% (n = 288). Perceived age discrimination was reported by 38.4% (n = 916) of the participants. Both frailty progression (OR 1.50, CI [1.26–1.78]) and frailty development (OR 1.39, CI [1.13–1.69]) were significantly associated with perceived age discrimination in the fully adjusted models. Age (80 + years) and long-standing illness had the strongest association with respondents’ frailty outcome; odds ratios (OR 3.67, CI [2.81–4.80]) and (OR 5.61, CI [4.55–6.92]) respectively.
Conclusion:
Perceived age discrimination significantly increased the risk of frailty progression and frailty development among ELSA participants.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study;Barnett K;The Lancet,2012
2. Interventions to Reduce Ageism Against Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Burnes D;Am J Public Health,2019
3. The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes;Cesari M;Age Ageing,2014
4. The need of operational paradigms for frailty in older persons: the SPRINTT project;Cesari M;Aging Clin Exp Res,2017
5. Chamberlain AM, Sauver JLS, Jacobson DJ, Manemann SM, Fan C, Roger VL, Yawn BP, Rutten LJF (2016) Social and behavioural factors associated with frailty trajectories in a population-based cohort of older adults. BMJ open, 6(5)