Discrimination of Protein-Protein and Protein-Peptide Interactions using Machine Learning Methods

Author:

Kumar A. Kiran1,Rathore R. S.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Bioinformatics, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya-824236, Bihar, India; Department of Biochemistry, Mahayogi Gorakhnath University, Gorakhpur-273007, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. Department of Bioinformatics, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya-824236, Bihar, India

Abstract

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPI) play important roles in almost all cellular processes. PPI also includes protein-peptide interactions (PPepI), which, by an estimate, account for 15–40% of all such interactions. Even though protein-protein and protein-peptide recognition mechanisms sound similar, seemingly subtle differences exist among them. Knowledge of such differences is essential for biologics design when augmentation or disruption of protein-protein interactions is substituted with peptide-based mimics. Peptide-based leads have multiple advantages, including longer shelf life, feasibility of oral delivery, flexibility of optimisation, screening, and versatility of mimetics synthesis. To characterise differences between protein-protein and protein-peptide interactions, we have used machine learning approaches to classify these interactions. We compiled three datasets, comprising protein-protein, protein-peptide, and non-interacting protein complexes, each of which has 212 high-quality crystal structures. We calculated 583 sequence and physicochemical properties based on the on the features of one protein partner in all three datasets. With the correlation-based feature selection attribute evaluator and the best first search method, 56 features were chosen for classification. We performed different supervised machine learning algorithms with a 10-fold cross-validation method for unbiased classification of PPI and PPepI datasets. The Bayesian network method yielded the highest accuracy of 80.53%. Further, to achieve the highest accuracy and identify relevant features that can be employed for peptide-based biologic design applications, we calculated 73 PPI-specific molecular descriptors and applied ML methods. Application of the simple logistic method resulted in the highest accuracy of 92.21% (recall 0.925, precision 0.920, ROC 0.978, and PRC 0.981). The present attempt to discriminate between the between the recognition mechanisms of protein-protein and protein-peptide in cellular processes should aid in the design of peptide-based biologics.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3