Interventions to promote cost-effectiveness in adult Intensive care units: consensus statement and considerations for best practice from a multidisciplinary and multinational eDelphi study

Author:

Kansal Amit1,Latour Jos M.2,See Kay Choong3,Rai Sumeet4,Cecconi Maurizo5,Britto Carl6,Morris Andrew Conway7,Savio Raymond Dominic8,Nadkarni Vinay M.9,Rao BK10,Mishra Rajesh11

Affiliation:

1. Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth

3. Division of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital

4. Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital

5. Department Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Humanitas University

6. Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital

7. Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine

8. Critical Care Services, Apollo Proton Cancer Center

9. Critical Care Medicine, and Pediatrics at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

10. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

11. Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinic

Abstract

Abstract Background There is limited evidence to guide interventions that promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units (ICU). The aim of this consensus statement is to identify globally applicable interventions for best ICU practice and provide guidance for judicious use of resources. Methods A three-round modified online Delphi process, using a web-based platform sought consensus from 61 multidisciplinary ICU experts (physicians, nurses, allied health, administrators) from 21 countries. Round 1 was qualitative to ascertain opinions on cost-effectiveness criteria based on four key domains of high-value healthcare (foundational elements; infrastructure fundamentals; care delivery priorities; reliability and feedback). Round 2 was qualitative and quantitative, while round 3 was quantitative to reiterate and establish criteria. Both rounds 2 and 3 utilised a five-point Likert scale for voting. Consensus was considered when > 70% of the experts voted for a proposed intervention. Thereafter, the steering group endorsed interventions that were identified as ‘critical’ by more than 50% of steering group members. These interventions and experts’ comments were summarized as final considerations for best practice. Results At the conclusion of round 3, consensus was obtained on 50 best practice considerations for cost-effectiveness in adult ICU. Finally, the steering group endorsed 9 ‘critical’ best practice considerations. This included adoption of a multidisciplinary ICU model of care, focus on staff training and competency assessment, ongoing quality audits, thus ensuring high quality of critical care services whether within or outside the four walls of ICUs, implementation of a dynamic staff roster, multidisciplinary approach to implementing end-of-life care, early mobilization and promoting international consensus efforts on the Green ICU concept. Conclusions This Delphi study with international experts resulted in 9 consensus statements and best practice considerations promoting cost-effectiveness in adult ICUs. Stakeholders (government bodies, professional societies) must lead the efforts to identify locally applicable specifics while working within these best practice considerations with the available resources.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3