Inclusion of a Computerized Test in ADHD Diagnosis Process can Improve Trust in the Specialists' Decision and Elevate Compliance Levels

Author:

Grossman Ephraim S.1,Berger Itai2

Affiliation:

1. Ariel University

2. Assuta Ashdod University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Abstract

Abstract Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) affects many life aspects of children and adults. Accurate identification, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD can facilitate better care. However, ADHD diagnosis and treatment methods are subject of controversy. Objective measures can elevate trust in specialist's decision and treatment compliance. In this observational study we asked whether knowing that a computerized test was included in ADHD diagnosis process results in more trust and intention to comply with treatment recommendations. Questionnaires were administered to 464 people, 198 men, average age=40.78(9.14). Questions regarding expected trust and compliance, trust trait, trust in physician and health-care-institutions, and ADHD scales followed a scenario about parents referred to a neurologist for sons' ADHD diagnosis. The scenario presented to the test group (n=189) mentioned that a computerized test was part of the diagnostic process. The control group scenario mention any computerized test being included in the diagnostic process. Test group participants expressed more trust in the diagnosis and greater levels of intention for treatment compliance. Group differences in intention for treatment compliance were mediated by trust in decision. Inclusion of a computerized test in ADHD diagnosis process can improve trust in the specialists' decision and elevate compliance levels.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference52 articles.

1. New dimensions in patient–physician interaction: Values, autonomy, and medical information in the patient-centered clinical encounter;Agarwal AK;Rambam Maimonides medical journal,2012

2. Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data;Pearson SD;Journal of general internal medicine,2000

3. Mapping publication trends and identifying hot spots of research on internet health information seeking behavior: A quantitative and co-word biclustering analysis;Li F;Journal of medical Internet research,2015

4. Should doctors encourage patients to record consultations?;Elwyn G;Bmj,2015

5. Patient acceptance and trust in automated computer-assisted diagnosis of melanoma with dermatofluoroscopy;Fink C;JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3